In Defense of HistoryE. H. Carr's What Is History?, a classic introduction to the field, may now give way to a worthy successor. In his compact, intriguing survey, Richard J. Evans shows us how historians manage to extract meaning from the recalcitrant past. To materials that are frustratingly meager, or overwhelmingly profuse, they bring an array of tools that range from agreed-upon rules of documentation and powerful computer models to the skilled investigator's sudden insight, all employed with the aim of reconstructing a verifiable, usable past. Evans defends this commitment to historical knowledge from the attacks of postmodernist critics who see all judgments as subjective. Evans brings "a remarkable range, a nose for the archives, a taste for controversy, and a fluent pen" (The New Republic) to this splendid work. "Essential reading for coming generations."-Keith Thomas |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 42
Page 1
... to university study by too many students on leaving high school , that history is simply a matter of objective fact . He introduces them to the idea that history books , like the people who write them , are Introduction.
... to university study by too many students on leaving high school , that history is simply a matter of objective fact . He introduces them to the idea that history books , like the people who write them , are Introduction.
Page 11
... simply accept without criticism the ideas the postmodernists themselves are pro- pounding ) . “ Those who announce the advent of postmodernism , " as Perez Zagorin , an eminent American specialist on seventeenth - cen- tury England ...
... simply accept without criticism the ideas the postmodernists themselves are pro- pounding ) . “ Those who announce the advent of postmodernism , " as Perez Zagorin , an eminent American specialist on seventeenth - cen- tury England ...
Page 12
... simply because they are espoused by the majority . In similar vein , some apologists for postmodernism have a tendency to proclaim that they have already won the argument and that there is no point any longer in historians ' trying to ...
... simply because they are espoused by the majority . In similar vein , some apologists for postmodernism have a tendency to proclaim that they have already won the argument and that there is no point any longer in historians ' trying to ...
Page 14
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 35
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Abraham American historian American Historical Review Ankersmit Annales school approach argued argument Arthur Marwick belief Britain British Cambridge Carr's causes claim concept contemporary course critics critique cultural debate declared Deconstructing discipline discourse documents Dominick LaCapra E. H. Carr England English European evidence example Frank Ankersmit French G. M. Trevelyan Geoffrey Elton Hayden White historians historical fact historical knowledge historical profession historical research historical scholarship historical writing Historiography History and Post-Modernism History London Holocaust denial human Ibid ideas Intellectual History interpretation J. H. Hexter Journal Joyce Keith Jenkins kind LaCapra language Lawrence Stone linguistic turn literary Marxist meaning modern moral Moreover Munslow Namier narrative Novick objective Oxford past postmodernism postmodernist practice present Purkiss Revolution rians scientific sense Sir Geoffrey Elton Social History social sciences society sources theory things thought tion torians torical tory traditional Trevelyan truth written