![[ocr errors]](https://books.google.co.uk/books/content?id=trcHAAAAQAAJ&output=html_text&pg=PA634&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&q=holy&cds=1&sig=ACfU3U3qvAB4P4TefaCKqBT0DHIkD9ofUQ&edge=0&edge=stretch&ci=992,664,5,8)
23. Whose I am, and whom I serve. In a word, the chosen and called are all saints, because separated from: the rest of the world, they are declared to be God's on several accounts. But we have not yet mentioned the principal thing:
X. Thirdly, Holiness denotes that purity of a caufe of man, in his nature, inclinations and actions, which their con consists in an imitation and expression of the divine formity to purity or holiness. God is the great patern of his rathe divine tional creatures. His will is exprefied in the law, purity, which was the patern shewn to Mofes in the mount,
according to which the sanctuary of our soul ought to be framed. But his divine virtues or perfections are a patern, which we are to contemplate with so much diligence, attention and devotion, as to be ourselves transformed according to that, i Pet. l, 15. 16. But as be which hath called you is holy. so be ye holy in all manner of conversation : because it is writ- ten, be ye boly, for I am holy. Virtue or holiness may be considered in different respects. As it agrees wich the prescription of the law, it is called righteousness; but as it is a conformity to God, and an expression of his purity, it is termed boliness. And it is chiefly in this fense, that we shall now speak concerning holi;
nets. Sanctifia
XI. Having, thus previously explained these cation de fined.
things, it will not be hard to infer, what we mean by SANCTIFICATION; namely, that real work of God, by which they, who are chosen, regenerated and justified, are continually more and more transformed from the tur;
pitude of fin, to the purity of the divine image. Diftin
XII. We distinguish this work of God from the guished first regeneration, and first effectual calling to Christ. from the For, the immediate term, or effect of regeneration, iş first rege- a principle of spiritual life, which, in a moment, iş nerațion
- put into the soul, by the immediate energy of the vion, Holy Spirit. The term, or effect of effectual calling is
the mystical union, and communion with Christ. But the term or effect of SANCTIFICATION are the habits
of
![[ocr errors]](https://books.google.co.uk/books/content?id=trcHAAAAQAAJ&output=html_text&pg=PA634&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&q=holy&cds=1&sig=ACfU3U3qvAB4P4TefaCKqBT0DHIkD9ofUQ&edge=0&edge=stretch&ci=992,950,6,17)
of fpiritual virtues or graces, and their lively exercise: and thus fanctification follows upon regeneration and effectual calling, at least in the order of nature, and fupposes those actions of God as going before it.
XIII. There is still a further difference between As also fanctification and justification : for justification is a from juftijudical act, terminating in a relative change of state ; fication. name'y, a freedom from punishment and a right to life: fanctification a real work, which is performed by a fupernatural influence, and which terminates in a change of state as to the quality both of habits and actions,
XIVYet we are to take notice, that the term, A distincsanctification, is not always taken, by divines, in this strict lense; fometimes they comprehend under ferved by
alwaysobit regeneration and the first infusion of a new life, and divines. take sanctification, renovation of the spirit, regeneration, the new creature, the first resurrection for synonymous terms; as the Leyden professors, Synops. Disput: 33. . 2. Sometimes also they include justification under the same term. It is well known, says the abridger of Chamierus, p. 860, that the terms, juftification and fan&tification are put one for the other. Gomarus in like manner, on i Pet. 1. 2. Sanēlification, taken in a general sense, comprizes regeneration and juftification. Nay fometimes, the word, fanctification, is taken fo largely, as to include the whole of man's salvation. Polonus in Syntagm. lib. 6. c. 37. Some. times both appellations, viz. regeneration and fan&tification, are taken in a larger sense, for the whole of our salvation, or beatification, if I may so speak, as Heb.
But
yet the accuracy of those is more commendable, who distinguish those terms in the manner I have explained: especially as the Scripture often distinctly mentions those benefits, and describes fanctification, as a continued work of God, leading the Elect gradually on to perfection, and as I do not remember, to have observed it speak fo of regeneraţion,
XV. Nor
![[ocr errors]](https://books.google.co.uk/books/content?id=trcHAAAAQAAJ&output=html_text&pg=PA635&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&q=holy&cds=1&sig=ACfU3U2x-VSJ6rGv1jAcr9oTXTGYQdVqUw&edge=0&edge=stretch&ci=88,1264,94,25)
Sanctifica XV. Nor are we to omit, that sanctification is
pro sometimes held forth as a blefling from God to man, poled frimetimes 1 Thes. 5. 23, and the very God of peace sanɛtify you as a blef- wholly ; sometimes as 'man's duty towards God, fing, from 1 Thell. 4. 3. For this is the will of God, even your God, lome fanctification. The former God powerfully works in
us, according to the purpose of his gracious decrec. duty. The latter he juitly requires of us, by the will of his
holy command. When fanctification denotes the first implantation of spiritual habits, it is a mere blef- sing from God, in procuring which we do not co- operate with him, but receive it from him. As it signifies the activity, or lively exercise of infufed habits, and their corroboration and progress, so far we are active; but then it is, as we are acted upon, under God, and dependently on him; for these things can
never be separated. The term XVI. The term from which, in sanctification, is the which is pollution of sin. Adam, in departing from the pre- the pollu- icribed rule, forfeited the ornainent of the image of tion of fin. Go!, in which he was formed, for himself and all his
posterity. And whilst he wickedly affected a forbidden equality with God, came most to resemble the devil, and, like that evil spirit, deformed himself by his own crime: than which we can imagine nothing more hideous or base. The foul of the finner is a horrid monster, misshappen, huge and devoid of light: mţre darkness, mere confusion, every thing. disjointed and out of order there ; nothing properly placed; the things we should defpile a e esteerned, and what we should value most are neglected. Was any to take a clear view of his inward disposition in a faithful mirrour, he would, certainly, with the ut. most horror, fly from himself, as from a most terri- ble spectacle. And indeed, if holiness is the most beautiful ornament of the divine perfections, that thing must needs be the most deforined, which is not only the most unlike, but diaetrically opposite to that ornamental beauty. This is that "purcpic xxv nepusotice xudies mentioned Jam. 1. 21. Filtliness and superfluity
of
![[ocr errors]](https://books.google.co.uk/books/content?id=trcHAAAAQAAJ&output=html_text&pg=PA636&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&q=holy&cds=1&sig=ACfU3U0B0ICjiC0x0KmZwjtx1oOC-aRmWw&edge=0&edge=stretch&ci=992,832,6,15)
of naughtiness, To this it is owing, that man is be- come abominable in the light of God, who cannot but turn away the radiant eyes of his unspotted holinels.
![[ocr errors]](https://books.google.co.uk/books/content?id=trcHAAAAQAAJ&output=html_text&pg=PA637&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&q=holy&cds=1&sig=ACfU3U24tGq7X0ztBUq0hnze2_0AqDKNsA&edge=0&edge=stretch&ci=11,605,8,35)
![[ocr errors]](https://books.google.co.uk/books/content?id=trcHAAAAQAAJ&output=html_text&pg=PA637&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&q=holy&cds=1&sig=ACfU3U24tGq7X0ztBUq0hnze2_0AqDKNsA&edge=0&edge=stretch&ci=873,667,4,10)
XVII. Moreover, Adam propagated this vile refem- Propablance of the devil to his posterity, not excepting those, gatedfrom whom grace has sanctified. For he allo begat Seih Adam to in his own likeness, after his image, Gen. 5. 3. I do
rity, not chiefly, apply this to the likeness of the human nature, much less to the likeness of that holiness, which God graciously restored to Adam, as Chry- sostom, Lyranus and Clarius contend for. For, iít. Holiness and righteousness are not the image of any man, but of God. 2dlý, Adam is never proposed
in Scripture, as the patern or author of holiness, but as the person, by whom sin entered into the world, Rom. 5. 12. zdly, The'iinage of holiness, restored . in the parent by grace, is never propagated to the fon, by natural generation. Things natural, are propagated, but things supernatural are alone of God that bewetb mercy. Rom. 9. 16.
16. But by this like- ness of Adam, I understand the vicious corruption of his nature. ift. Because the image of Adam, after
Seth was begotten, is set in opposition to the image of God, after which Adam was created. 2dly, Because the Apostle, in like manner, opposes 1 Cor. 15. 49, the image of the earthy Adam, as consisting of sin and pollution, to the image of the heavenly Adam, which consists in holiness and glory. 3dly, because the whole analogy of Scripture evinces, that a clean thing cannot be brought out of an unclean, and that what is born of the fles is flesh, Job. 14. 4. John 3. 6.
XVIII. This turpitude of sin is, by Paul, called the Called the old man, Eph. 4. 22. Col. 3. 9. Man, because it over- because it {preads the whole man, and defiles both foul and defiles the body; in the soul it has possession of the understanding, whole will and affections.
XIX. It has involved the understanding in hor- Blinding rid darkness, whereby it is grony ignorant of divine the under
things,
standing
![[ocr errors]](https://books.google.co.uk/books/content?id=trcHAAAAQAAJ&output=html_text&pg=PA637&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&q=holy&cds=1&sig=ACfU3U24tGq7X0ztBUq0hnze2_0AqDKNsA&edge=0&edge=stretch&ci=0,1255,4,10)
![[ocr errors]](https://books.google.co.uk/books/content?id=trcHAAAAQAAJ&output=html_text&pg=PA638&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&q=holy&cds=1&sig=ACfU3U00-8ELxPz2CMAqkz-Tuwfr-nEl5Q&edge=0&edge=stretch&ci=977,180,15,16)
things, Eph. 4. 18. So that the är@gwtos fugir@ the 'na- tural or animal man, or he that has no other spirit but his soul, and destitute of the spirit of God, Jud. v. 20, recciveth not the things of God, neither can he know them, i Cor. 2. 14. And as he discerns no wisdom in divine things, worthy of God, so, with in- tolerable presumption, he represents them under those disagreeable notions, which his own foolish, and felf conceited wisdom hath devised; and while he at- tempts to correct the wisdom of God, which he can- not understand, he transfigures it, as much as he can, to downright folly, And this is that, which is faid, Rom. 1. 22, 23. Professing themselves to be wife, they became fools: and changed the glory of the incor- -ruptible God, &c.
XX. But the finner is not only under blindness,
but is in love with his blindness. He glories, that that blind. ness. he really sees, even when he is most blind, John 9,
40, 41. And when, to the utmost of his power, he refifts the true light, tho' discovering itself, in a most pleasing manner, by the works of divine providence, by the word of God, and by some sparkling, rays of the spirit; be loves darkness rather than light; baleth the light, neither cometb to the light. John 3. 19, 20. Of such Job witnesseth, that they are of those that re. bell against the light, Job 24. 13. They have an aver- fion to all light, both that which is natural, which hinders them from perpetrating their crimes in the fight of the world, and that which is moral, which convinces them of the duty, they ought certainly to perform, but which they wickedly neglect. They endeavour to stile it, by disputing both against the word of God and their own conscience. Hence, those impious expressions of fome, who wish, that this, or the other truth, that opposes their lufts, was not to be found in the word of God.
XXI. And yet, those very persons, that are so fool- wisdom to ish in that which is good, are most subtile and crafty do evil. is that which is evil. Jer. 4. 22. They commit evil
by
« PreviousContinue » |