The Manuscript of Shakeseapre's Hamlet and the Problems of Its TransmissionCUP Archive |
Contents
INTRODUCTION | 175 |
THE FRAMEWORK OF THE TEXT | 182 |
Punctuation | 192 |
b The pointing in Q2 | 196 |
c Editorial implications | 208 |
Linearrangement and the printing of letters and songs etc | 216 |
THE CHOICE OF VARIANTS | 230 |
Grammatical variants and archaic forms | 235 |
Genuine corruption | 296 |
2 Confusion between singular and plural | 299 |
3 Omissions | 301 |
4 Mistakes due to spelling | 303 |
5 Graphical errors | 305 |
Appendices | 332 |
DELIBERATE ALTERATIONS OR CORRECTIONS | 341 |
A COMPArative TablE OF STAGEDIREC | 353 |
The problem of omission | 244 |
Variants proper | 262 |
EMENDATION | 286 |
E A TABLE OF VARIANTS IN THE DIALOGUE | 370 |
F NOTES AND QUERIES SUPPLIED BY J C | 427 |
Common terms and phrases
ยน Vide Bad Quarto 1603 betimes Capell choller commas context Corambis doth doubt Dowd Dowden Dr Greg Dr Johnson emendation Enter Ghost Enter Hamlet Enter Horatio Enter King Enter Polonius Enter Queene euen example Exeunt Exit Ghost F1 reading F1 text farre Folio followed F1 Furn giue gives Globe Shakespeare 1864 graue Guildenstern ha's hand hath haue heauen Hecuba heere instances Laertes leaue letters liue lonius loue meaning misprint misreading mother night noyse omission omitted Ophelia Osric passage play Players pollax pray printed prompt-book punctuation Q2 and F1 Q2 compositor Q2 Pope Q2 reading Q2 text quoted Rosencrantz Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Rowe Sallery sallets sallied Scribe Second Quarto 1605 sense Shakespearian somnet speech spelling stage-directions Sweare sweet lord textual thee thing thou variants Vide vol vpon weole word