The Law Times, Volume 132Butterworths., 1912 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 98
Page 8
... question raised was whether the defendant was entitled to throw upon solvent co - owners a proportion of the loss occasioned by the fact that H. J. was alleged not to be in a position to repay the over - payments made . For the ...
... question raised was whether the defendant was entitled to throw upon solvent co - owners a proportion of the loss occasioned by the fact that H. J. was alleged not to be in a position to repay the over - payments made . For the ...
Page 11
... question was not a Statute of Limitations , and , further , that the defence was not properly raised by the notice under rule 18 ; he therefore heard the action and gave judgment for the plaintiff . His decision was overruled in the ...
... question was not a Statute of Limitations , and , further , that the defence was not properly raised by the notice under rule 18 ; he therefore heard the action and gave judgment for the plaintiff . His decision was overruled in the ...
Page 27
... question is to the effect that , where an old building is demised , it is not meant by a mere covenant to repair that it is " to be restored in a renewed form at the end of the term , or of greater value than it was at the commence ...
... question is to the effect that , where an old building is demised , it is not meant by a mere covenant to repair that it is " to be restored in a renewed form at the end of the term , or of greater value than it was at the commence ...
Page 38
... question under the Act . I think , on the facts , that this claim falls within sub - sect . ( e ) of sched . 2 ( 9 ) and not under sub - sect . ( c ) . It follows that an appli- cation under that sub - section must be brought within six ...
... question under the Act . I think , on the facts , that this claim falls within sub - sect . ( e ) of sched . 2 ( 9 ) and not under sub - sect . ( c ) . It follows that an appli- cation under that sub - section must be brought within six ...
Page 47
... question of fraudulent preference , he said that sect . 210 of the Companies Consolidation Act invalidated payments made within three months from the com- mencement of a winding - up , and that as to what constituted fraudulent ...
... question of fraudulent preference , he said that sect . 210 of the Companies Consolidation Act invalidated payments made within three months from the com- mencement of a winding - up , and that as to what constituted fraudulent ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action amendment application appointed arbitration ARTHUR Bankruptcy Bill Birmingham Bream's-buildings Bristol Charles claim clause clerk committee Company Limited Compensation contract Conveyancing council County Court judge Court of Appeal Courts of Justice covenant creditors Criminal dealer deceased decision defendant duty Edward entitled Friday GAZETTE George Gray's-inn held Henry High Court Honour House of Commons House of Lords Inner Temple inst interest James John judgment jurisdiction jury King's Bench Division L. T. Rep land late Law Society Leeds liable LIMITED.-Creditors to send Lincoln's-inn Liverpool London Long Eaton Lord Chancellor Manchester matter ment Messrs Middle Temple Monday mortgage Newcastle-upon-Tyne Parliament payment person plaintiff Pontypridd purchaser question Railway received Robert rule Saturday sect session Ship Solicitors sols statute Thomas Thursday tion trading trustees Tuesday Vict Walsall Wednesday WILLIAM winding-up Windsor House