 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - Law reports, digests, etc - 1839 - 728 pages
...divested by gift or sale, of which no specific act was even surmised. But the rule of law is clear, that where one, by his words or conduct, wilfully...different state of things as existing at the same time ; and the plaintiff in this case might have parted with his interest in the property by verbal gift... | |
 | Joseph Story - Equity - 1839 - 658 pages
...to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief •o as to alter his own previous position, the former...different state of things, as existing at the same time ; and the Plaintiff might have parted with his interest in the property by verbal gift or sale without... | |
 | Ireland. Court of King's Bench - Law reports, digests, etc - 1850 - 646 pages
...existence " of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief so " as to alter his own position, the former is concluded from averring "...latter a different state of things as existing at that "same time." Negligence may be given in evidence under the general issue : Cough v. Bryan (m)... | |
 | Graham Willmore, Frederick Luard Wollaston, Henry Davison - Law reports, digests, etc - 1839 - 810 pages
...and induces him to ar: that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is conclndf. from averring against the latter a different state of things as existing at t'same time ; and the plaintiff in this case might have parted with his inters in the property by verbal... | |
 | John William Smith - 1840 - 530 pages
...court in that case, " that where one, by his words or conduct, wilfully causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces...different state of things as existing at the same time." See the above principle affirmed in Gregg v. Wellt, 2 P. & Day. 296 ; and see Sandys v. Hodyton, 2... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - Law reports, digests, etc - 1840 - 796 pages
...the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter bis own previous position, the former is concluded from...different state of things as existing at the same time." Then the question, whether the jury came to a right conclusion, is one upon which much may be said;... | |
| |
But the rule of law is clear, .that, where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to believe the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded... 
