| George Farkas, Paula England - Business & Economics - 1988 - 374 pages
...text. ''Based on 119 urban economies. 'Based on 76 urban economies. 'Based on 119 urban economies. 'Significant at the 0.10 level. 'Significant at the 0.05 level. 'Significant at the 0.01 level. multiple correlation coefficients, adjusted for degrees of freedom, are reported in Table 5. As can... | |
| Seth Anderson, Gustav V. R Born - Business & Economics - 1992 - 174 pages
...CEICs: Issues and Answers Table 4.38 - Brauer's Abnormal Return Evidence on Open-End Announcement • Significant at the 0.10 level " Significant at the 0.05 level "'Significant at the 0.01 level Event time (mo.) Average Cumulative abnormal Cumulative abnormal abnormal return return return -12... | |
| George Farkas, Paula England - Political Science - 388 pages
...Labor force quality Labor surplus "Evaluated at age 25 years, sc variation in effects. hSignificant at the 0.10 level. 'Significant at the 0.05 level. ^Significant at the 0.01 level. en 1 0 $ (S) 8 t ^ — OS u '"" tn Sc < 133 " o 31 ax •£ 60 -, '3 O CQ II .a3 1-a 1 3 <? e o Z SSSrt°fn... | |
| Margaret Weir - Political Science - 1998 - 590 pages
...Percent correctly predicted N 89.8 215 89.8 215 TABLE 2-5. Vote Margins of Republican Incumbents, 1996 *Significant at the 0.10 level. "Significant at the 0.05 level. ***Significant at the 0.001 level. can incumbent's vote proportion by almost 6 percent. But the contract scores are so skewed... | |
| William F. Hyde, Brian Murray Belcher, Jintao Xu - Business & Economics - 2003 - 244 pages
...Regressions for the Northern Forest Production Region Note: Asymptotic f-tests shown in parentheses. *Significant at the 0.10 level. **Significant at the 0.05 level. ***Significant at the 0.01 level. trend variable is included in the regression.-r' This is the expected result if farmers harvest at... | |
| Murugan Anandarajan, Asokan Anandarajan, Cadambi A. Srinivasan - Business & Economics - 2004 - 282 pages
...R:=0.29 Model Adjusted R:=0. 23 0.18 ( 2.22") 0.23 Table 10.3. Regression of PME on the System fit Significant at the 0.10 level Significant at the 0.05 level Significant at the 0.0t level 10.5 Conclusions This study examined the relationship between the degree of alignment between... | |
| Carl Davidson, Steven Joseph Matusz - Business & Economics - 2004 - 156 pages
...Proponents (Tabulated by identity of factor, sector of employment, and rate of job turnover)3 NOTE: * significant at the 0.10 level; ** significant at the 0.05 level; *** significant at the 0.01 level on one-sided /-tests. SOURCE: Magee, Davidson, and Matusz (2002, Table 2). of its contributions flowing... | |
| J. Timothy Sale - Business & Economics - 2004 - 262 pages
...period 1992-1998. Equations : (3xi = a,, + a, EMINV, + a2 EMOPH, + a3CFLOW, + a4INCST,+ a5BSHEET, + m * Significant at the 0.10 level. ** Significant at the 0.05 level. *** Significant at the 0.01 level. Intercept -0.8590 (-3.40)"* -1.0596 (-2.19)" -0.1165 (-0.81) EMINV 0.0010 (0.47) 0.0064(1.79)* -0.0025... | |
| David R. Howell - Business & Economics - 2004 - 368 pages
...Belgium 59 Table 2.3. Univariate Regression Results: Skills, Institutions, and Earnings Inequality * significant at the 0.10 level. ** significant at the 0.05 level. *** significant at the 0.01 level. Each cell shows the result of a separate OLS regression test. In many cases the D9/D1 ratio was not... | |
| Deepa Narayan-Parker - Social Science - 2005 - 500 pages
...0.51 0.74 0.55 0.65 0.59 0.96 0.57 3.96 1.37 4.15 1.22 3.57 1.56 3.22 0.79 3.16 0.82 2.89 0.94 : ' Significant at the 0.10 level. : ' * Significant at...the 0.05 level. *** Significant at the 0.01 level. can suffer frustration and stress even while enjoying upward mobility. 32 In contrast, absolute income... | |
| |