sane person resides, or if he be not in | the state, then to the county in which he last resided, or in which his pro- perty lies.-Campbell's case, 217. In some cases his appearance before the inquest may be dispensed with, 217. Formerly the estate of a lunatic might be saved, but not so now, in a creditor's suit, 224-Watkins v. Worthington, 520. The jurisdiction of the Chancellor as to infants and lunatics.-Corrie's case, 492.
MARSHALLING ASSETS AND
On a motion for such an order, the whole of the answer must be taken together, and for true, 267.
A defendant will not be ordered to pay money found due on a decree to account to a trustee, but to bring it into court.- Tyson v. Hollingsworth, 332.
On a bill to foreclose the answer of an infant by his guardian ad litem admit- ting the facts deemed sufficient for a decree.-Lansdale v. Clarke, 358. A decree of foreclosure, unless payment of the aggregate of principal and inte- rest, with interest thereon by a speci- fied day.-Atkinson v. Hall, 372. That clause in the act incorporating the Farmers' Bank of Maryland, which de- clares that debts due by a stockholder must be first paid before a transfer gives to the bank a pledge or mortgage.-The Farmers' Bank of Maryland's case, 394. The mortgagee of stock may sell with- An injunction granted to a mortgagee to out a bill to foreclose, 397.
stay waste before the debt became due. Murdock's case, 461.
In a bill by a mortgagee to stay waste be- fore the debt became due, the prayer for a sale rejected as surplusage, so that on another bill to foreclose or sell, the first was not considered as another suit for the same cause then pending, 463. A mortgagee cannot sue upon the bond for his debt, and also have a foreclosure at the same time.-Andrews v. Scotton, 665.
In a suit to foreclose or sell, if by a sale, the whole debt should not be paid, the court cannot decree the payment of the balance, 668.--Worthington v. Lee, 683. A decree of foreclosure, but in case of payment a release of the mortgage.- Wardrop v. Hall, 666; Hunter v. Guant, 667; Buchanan v. Shannon, The act of assembly which allows a mort- 667; Worthington v. Lee, 685. gagee to have a sale, does not prevent him from having a foreclosure instead thereof.-Andrews v. Scotton, 666. Under a fieri facias at law against the mortgagor, the purchaser at the sheriff's sale of the equity of redemption for less than the mortgage debt, takes it as in- cumbered with the residue thereof.- Worthington v. Lee, 681.
A mortgagor who has not been legally divested of his whole interest, must be made a party, 682.
mortgagor who has an interest in sta- ting the account, or from whom any discovery may be drawn, must be made a party, 683.
of a certain amount due, duplicate | It is sufficient that the husband alone be
writs of ne exeat were ordered to seve- ral counties, in one or other of which the defendants were expected to be found.-Sloss v. Mcllvane, 72.
An opinion asked by a Provincial Chan- cellor of some of the judges of the courts of Westminster.-Birchfield v. Miller, 59.
The Chancellor may ask the opinion of the judges on any question of law. Chamberlain v. Brown, 221.
A partition of personal estate can be or- dered only by a Court of Chancery; and if necessary, a sale may be order- ed.-Crapster v. Griffith, 25. On a partition decreed to be made among devisees, the parties ordered to pay costs in proportion.-Winder v. Diffen- derffer, 179, 180.
A part of the property being incapable of partition, ordered to be sold, and the proceeds divided among the devisees, 180.
A trustee who had held the estate order- ed to account for its rents and profits,
Real estate devised to be sold and the proceeds divided, on petition ex parte, à trustee appointed for that purpose.- Ex parte Boone, 321.
Bonds taken by the trustee who made the sale, ordered to be assigned to the parties entitled, 321.
A devise of the rents and profits of land for the maintenance of several infants, not susceptible of partition.-Tilly v. Tilly, 438.
Specific performance of an agreement for partition decreed.-Norwood v. Nor- wood, 476, 483, 485.
made a party, to shew that he has ob- tained satisfaction of the chose in action of his wife.-Contee v. Dawson, 281. Who may or must be made parties to a creditor's suit.-Hammond v. Ham- mond, 347, 349.
The creditors of the ancestor of a deceased debtor may come in under a creditor's suit, without making the executor or administrator of such deceased ancestor parties.-Hindman v. Clayton, 341. Where the debt is joint and several, all the debtors must be made parties.- Watkins v. Worthington, 522. The general rule, that all persons inte- rested must be made parties, is made to yield where necessary either as to plaintiffs or defendants, 524.
All questions as to parties must be finally adjusted before there can be a decree to account.-Helms v. Franciscus, 559. All persons having an interest in the ob- ject of the suit should be made parties. Worthington v. Lee, 680.
A mortgagor who has not been legally divested of his whole interest, must be made a party, 682.
A mortgagor who has an interest in sta- ting the account, or from whom any discovery may be drawn, may be made a party, 683.
It is not necessary to make the personal representatives of the mortgagor a party to a bill to foreclose or sell; but upon the death of the mortgagee it is neces- sary to make both his heirs and per- sonal representatives parties, 684.
An answer as to the same facts over-rules the plea.-The Bank v. Dugan, 257. PORT.
What constitutes a port, its nature, &c.— Canal and sea vessels should meet in a Binney's case, 156, 157. port, 162, 165.
PRACTICE. Where one of the defendants answers and disclaims, the bill may be at once dis- missed as to him with costs.-Kipp ". Hanna, 28.
A feme covert on failing to answer may be attached, 28.
The bill amended so as to state that a de- | fendant had attained his full age, in order that he might be compelled to answer as an adult, 29.
On petition, a subpæna may be issued against one charged in the bill as an absent defendant, who had returned to this state, 29.
A case cannot be set for hearing on the return of depositions taken by consent of only a part of the defendants, 30. After the day allowed by an order of pub- lication, which had been published for an absent defendant to come in, and on a general replication to the answers of the other defendants, a commission to take evidence may be issued, 31. An interlocutory decree by default against infant as well as adult defendants.- Townshend v. Duncan, 47.
A decree by default against a defendant, who, on being summoned under an or- der of revivor, had failed to appear, 47. Rules concerning the examination of wit- nesses before the examiner; and the time of publication of depositions un- der the provincial government, 61, note. Exceptions to an answer heard and sus- tained by the Chancellor.-Parker v. Mackall, 63.
An exceptant ordered to pay a fine for the delay on over-ruling his exceptions to the auditor's report.--Woodward v. Chapman, 71.
Rule as to the time of filing exceptions to an auditor's report, 74, note. Exceptions to an answer for scandal, im- pertinence, and insufficiency; the scan- dal and impertinence expunged, and a better answer filed.-Cheseldine v. Gor- don, 80.
No one is a defendant to the suit against whom no process is prayed.-Binney's case, 106.
A misnomer may be waived, but if relied on is fatal, 107.
The hearing cannot be postponed to let in a release to make a witness compe- tent, or to remove any objection to a witness of which the party was notified at the examination.-Winder v. Diffen- derffer, 192.
A cross examination no waiver of any objection to a witness, 193.
A decree cannot be opened and the case re-heard but upon good cause shewn. Meluy v. Cooper, 200.
In a creditor's suit the case may be sub- mitted to obtain a decree for sale with- out having been set for hearing.— Campbell's case, 220; Hammond v. Hammond, 359.
The parol does not demur in a creditor's suit by reason of the infancy of a de- fendant.-Campbell's case, 224; Ham- mond v. Hammond, 330, 344, 351; Wat- kins v. Worthington, 519.
Several suits, the objects of which are the same, may be consolidated.-Camp- bell's case, 241; Deakins' case, 398. Where a publication had passed against an absent defendant who was one of a plurality of heirs or devisees, it was decreed, that the plaintiff might take out a commission to prove his case subject to a future decree.-Craig v. Baker, 240.
A sale by a trustee may be at once rati- fied with the consent of the parties.- Andrews v. Scotton, 644; Arthur v. The Attorney General, 246.
A party may, as of course, withdraw any document which he himself has volun- tarily put upon file, for the purpose of having it authenticated.-Maccubbin v. Matthews, 251.
A commission to take evidence should be executed within a reasonable dis- tance of the residence of the witness, 253.
The sufficiency of a trustee's bond certi- fied by a solicitor.-McMullin v. Bur- ris, 358.
On a return cepi to an attachment the sheriff may be ordered to bring in the body.-Binney's case, 101; Deakins'
The acts of assembly in relation to pro- ceedings against non-resident, abscond- ing, or contumacious defendants, con- sidered, 447.
In all such cases the bill may be taken pro confesso, or testimony taken, upon which the court pronounces the de- cree; and if it has no jurisdiction, must dismiss the bill, 447. How discovery may be had when the bill may be taken pro confesso, 447. An insufficient answer is as no answer; and therefore, upon such default, the bill may be taken pro confesso and a final decree passed, 447.
A day may be appointed for deciding on an auditor's report.-Norwood v. Nor- wood, 478.
Exceptions to an auditor's report which
are indefinite must be rejected, 481, 482. No new exceptions can be taken to an auditor's report after those taken have been adjudicated upon, 482.
Where it becomes necessary to have the plaintiff's prochein ami examined as a witness, he may be discharged, and another appointed in his place.-Helms v. Franciscus, 550.
All questions as to parties must be finally
The heir or devisee held personally liable for the value of the real assets aliened before suit brought, leaving them in the hands of a bona fide purchaser en- tirely free.--Campbell's case, 238; Craig v. Baker, 238.
Where there were a plurality of devisees, the real assets in the hands of each, as specified and valued, declared to be liable. Craig v. Baker, 238. Where land had been mortgaged, by the devisor, and the devisee had paid the mortgage debt-the balance only de- clared to be real assets, subject to the devisor's other creditors, 239. How far lands in possession, reversion, or remainder in the hands of an heir or
devisee are liable for debt at common law or by statute.-Hammond v. Ham- mond, 317, 325, 337; Hindman v. Clay- ton, 337.
When real estate is considered as legal or equitable assets.-Hammond v. Ham- mond, 320.
Where the property or its profits are in imminent danger of being wasted or lost, a receiver may be appointed.— Kipp v. Hanna, 31.
An order to revive under the act of assembly, on the death of a defen- dant.-Townshend v. Duncan, 47.
An order under a bill of revivor, that the case stand revived.-Sloss v. McIlvane, 73.
The Potomac river belongs altogether to the state of Maryland.-Binney's case, 123, 127.
The Potomac above tide declared to be a navigable highway to a certain extent, 124, 128.
A river not navigable may be made so by law, 125.
A riparian holder has a right so to use
the waters of a river as not to injure the rights of others, 125.
The compact between Maryland and Vir- ginia as to the river Potomac, 126. A common use of rivers flowing between conterminous states presumed, unless, as in the case of the Potomac, the con- trary can be shewn, 127. The banks of rivers, why designated as right and left, 127, note. Improved river navigation as distin- guished from canal navigation, 158.
SALES UNDER A DECREE.
Any device or contrivance at a sale, although no positive fraud be shewn, will be sufficient to set it aside because of its not having been fairly made.- Andrews v. Scotton, 644; The State v. Brookes, 43.
A sale may be at once ratified with the
consent of all parties.-Andrews r. Scotton, 644; Arthur v. The Attorney- General, 246.
Real estate decreed to be sold by a mas- ter under the provincial government.— Orchard v. Smith, 319.
The proceeds brought in and deposited
in the treasury.-Ex parte Conway, 324. A further sale may be ordered if the first
has not produced enough to satisfy all.-Tyson v. Hollingsworth, 329. A purchaser for just cause may be re- leased from his purchase, but if he retains it he must pay interest whether he gets possession or not.-Brown v.
Wallace, 594; Tyson v. Hollingsworth, 334.
A sale ratified after a lapse of many years, no cause having been shewn.- McMullin v. Burris, 358. That the court may not be baffled, it may order, that the bids of some persons be not received at all, or only upon con- dition. Murdock's case, 465; Monroe v. Monroe, 465; Cresap v. Martin, 466. No alienation of a party, pendente lite, can affect the title of the purchaser under the decree.-Brown v. Wallace, 595. The report of the trustee, when con- firmed, is conclusive as to the terms of the sale, 595.
When land is sold by the acre, a survey and admeasurement, to ascertain the amount, is granted as of course, 596. In what cases land may be said to be sold by the tract, or by the acre, 596. A purchaser cannot impeach the sale on the ground, that more had been sold than was necessary, 598.
The court sells only the interest of the parties, hence the rule caveat emptor applies to all judicial sales, 599.-An- drews v. Scotton, 646. The mode of selling land under a decree; the court is the vendor, and retains a lien which may be enforced summarily, and the purchaser proceeded against at the same time.-Andrews v. Scotton, 629.
of limitations against any item by way of exceptions to the auditor's report.- Norwood v. Norwood, 481.
The application of the principles of sub- stitution.-Winder v. Diffenderffer, 199.
A warrant of re-survey issued and the ex- ceptions thereto over-ruled.-The Pro- prietary v. Bordley, 62.
A survey may be ordered on the applica- tion of either party.-Norwood v. Nor- wood, 475.
The lands laid down for either or both of the parties, must be laid down on the same plot; but duplicate plots may be This court cannot decide on the true made at the request of either party, 475. location of land without referring it to The surveyor of the county may be or- a jury, 476. dered to lay down the lands in contro- versy, to take depositions, and to return plots.-Andrews v. Scotton, 632. Locations not counter-located are admit- ted, 633.
Surveyor's fees are a part of the costs, and if not taxed under the decree as affirmed by the Court of Appeals this court can give no relief, 662.
The biddings are never opened merely to Where trustees under a will, not having
let in a higher bid, 671.
A plaintiff, after a decree in his favour for the delivery of certain slaves, may, by a new bill, recover their increase and profits, which had accrued since the auditor's report, upon which the decree was founded.-Crapster v. Grif- fith, 19.
A gift of freedom to a slave is a specific legacy.-Hammond v. Hammond, 314.
A sheriff ordered to bring in the body of a defendant returned attached for not answering.-Kipp v. Hanna, 28. Sheriff amerced for not bringing in the body.-Watts v. Campbell, 102; Wal- lace v. Boteler, 101.
STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. In a creditor's suit the statute of limita- tions continues to run until the creditor comes in.-Welch v. Stewart, 37. No one can have the benefit of the statute after an act done which implies an abandonment of such a defence, 37. A claim barred by a great lapse of time.- The State v. Brookes, 43.
Under a decree to account a party may avail himself of the benefit of the act
authority to sell, refuse to act, on a bill, making them and the cestui que trusts, parties, another trustee may be appointed.--Winder v. Diffenderffer,
A trustee who had held the estate of which partition was decreed, ordered to account for its rents and profits, 179. A trustee having the profits of the estate in his hands, ordered to pay the audi- tor's fees, 176.
The commissions allowed to a trustee not to be lessened on account of that for which he had been charged with compound interest, 207.
It is the duty of a trustee to keep the court fully informed of all matters in relation to his trust, 174.-Jones v. Stockett, 426.
Any one recognized as a trustee though not so expressly appointed must there- after be so treated.-Winder v. Diffen- derffer, 197.
Where estates have been devised to be sold to pay debts, the trustee, who has accepted the trust, may be ordered to proceed, and to sell as directed real estate lying out of the state.-Camp- bell's case, 211.
Testamentary trustees on failing to give
bond as required may be removed, 212. A trustee is liable for all the consequences
« PreviousContinue » |