Science and religion: are they compatible?
In recent years a noticeable trend toward harmonizing the distinct worldviews of science and religion has become increasingly popular. This is due in part to public curiosity but also to the financial sponsorship of The John Templeton Foundation, which has poured a great deal of money into awards, fellowships, conferences, university courses, and publications. Despite marked public interest, many leading scientists remain skeptical that there is much common ground between scientific knowledge and religious belief. In this stimulating collection of articles on the subject, the editors have assembled the thoughts of scientists from various disciplines. Among the distinguished contributors are Sir Arthur C. Clarke (author of many famous works of science fiction); Nobel Prize Laureate Steven Weinberg (professor of physics at the University of Texas at Austin); Neil deGrasse Tyson (astrophysicist and director of the Hayden Planetarium); James Lovelock (creator of the Gaia hypothesis); Kendrick Frazier (editor of the "Skeptical Inquirer); Steven Pinker (cognitive scientist at MIT); Richard Dawkins (zoologist at Oxford University); Eugenie Scott (executive director of the National Center for Science Education); Owen Gingerich (Harvard astronomer); and many other eminent scientists and scholars. Among the topics discussed are the Big Bang and the origin of the universe, the nature of the "soul, " near-death experiences, and spiritualism.
Results 1-3 of 55
The virus they introduced was not a macromolecule but a meme (a replicating
idea): the idea that science was a "colonial" imposition, not a worthy substitute for
the practices and beliefs that had carried the Third World country to its current ...
Consequently, if the idea of immortality is wrong, there is no need for a soul to
make us immortal. How about the soul as the source of free will? Human decision
making is now considered to be a physical process in the brain. As such, it
helps if we view the idea of God skeptically, as a product of the traditional
worldview, not the scientific worldview. In that worldview, people are not persons
because of natural processes. They are persons because they are made in the
What people are saying - Write a review
LibraryThing ReviewUser Review - quantum_flapdoodle - LibraryThing
The author does a good job of describing the controversies between science and religion, but is too quick to dismiss the reality of the disputes, and the difficulty of resolving them. Adopting ... Read full review
An Overview of the Issues
Are Science and Religion Conflicting or Complementary? Some Thoughts About Boundaries
Cosmology and God
44 other sections not shown