Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 82
Page 40
James G. March, Johan P. Olsen. 3.1 Attention Structures Attention is regulated by rules . Rules specify who is permitted to attend to a particular choice and who is required to do so ; when a decision may be made and when it must be ...
James G. March, Johan P. Olsen. 3.1 Attention Structures Attention is regulated by rules . Rules specify who is permitted to attend to a particular choice and who is required to do so ; when a decision may be made and when it must be ...
Page 44
... attention structures are those connected to personal identity and status and those connected to ideology and causal maps of the world . One of the primary ways by which an individual in an ... Attention The distribution of attention is 44.
... attention structures are those connected to personal identity and status and those connected to ideology and causal maps of the world . One of the primary ways by which an individual in an ... Attention The distribution of attention is 44.
Page 45
... attention is particularly problematic under con- ditions of ambiguity and when traditional norms are predominantely egalitarian . Such conditions lead to relatively unsegmented , permissive attention structures . The constraints on ...
... attention is particularly problematic under con- ditions of ambiguity and when traditional norms are predominantely egalitarian . Such conditions lead to relatively unsegmented , permissive attention structures . The constraints on ...
Contents
Acknowledgments | 7 |
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Copyright | |
19 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity arena assembly attention attitudes behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making demands desegregation discussion District educational effects enrollment expect faculty members full professors garbage garbage can model goals Hedmark house meeting ideology illegitimacy implementation important individual interest interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less level of aspiration major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organization organizational choice outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible presidents problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenure theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo values variables Vest-Agder Vestfold Vice-Chancellor vote