Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 82
Page 96
... discussion . First meeting of the search committee ( appointed by the Vice - Chancellor ) . The search committee meets . Proposal for building a list of candidates and discussion about how to approach candidates . A candidate visits the ...
... discussion . First meeting of the search committee ( appointed by the Vice - Chancellor ) . The search committee meets . Proposal for building a list of candidates and discussion about how to approach candidates . A candidate visits the ...
Page 163
... discussion , no agreement on whether to discuss goals or structure 3 ) group discussion . The groups can decide themselves what to discuss 4 ) School board demands final decision on their proposal . Many objections . The school board ...
... discussion , no agreement on whether to discuss goals or structure 3 ) group discussion . The groups can decide themselves what to discuss 4 ) School board demands final decision on their proposal . Many objections . The school board ...
Page 172
... discussion was also the chairman of a committee , the task of which was to provide more space for the school . The architect , projected a building which consisted of only one big room , not very suitable for a workshop structure . This ...
... discussion was also the chairman of a committee , the task of which was to provide more space for the school . The architect , projected a building which consisted of only one big room , not very suitable for a workshop structure . This ...
Contents
Acknowledgments | 7 |
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Copyright | |
19 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity arena assembly attention attitudes behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making demands desegregation discussion District educational effects enrollment expect faculty members full professors garbage garbage can model goals Hedmark house meeting ideology illegitimacy implementation important individual interest interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less level of aspiration major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organization organizational choice outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible presidents problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenure theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo values variables Vest-Agder Vestfold Vice-Chancellor vote