Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 93
Page 28
... structure ; in the latter of the access structure . The decision structure is a mapping of individuals on choice oppor- tunities ( or classes of choice opportunities ) . If we have N potential participants and M classes of choices ...
... structure ; in the latter of the access structure . The decision structure is a mapping of individuals on choice oppor- tunities ( or classes of choice opportunities ) . If we have N potential participants and M classes of choices ...
Page 41
... structure is important . In a highly segmented structure it may effectively determine major features of the outcomes . For the most part , however , the structure interacts with the way in which individuals and groups exercise ...
... structure is important . In a highly segmented structure it may effectively determine major features of the outcomes . For the most part , however , the structure interacts with the way in which individuals and groups exercise ...
Page 363
... structure was postponed for a week . This means that the teachers can expect a final decision at the house meeting on November 5. The teachers discuss how they should react to the restructuring proposal . It is clear that it is the ...
... structure was postponed for a week . This means that the teachers can expect a final decision at the house meeting on November 5. The teachers discuss how they should react to the restructuring proposal . It is clear that it is the ...
Contents
Acknowledgments | 7 |
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Copyright | |
19 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity arena assembly attention attitudes behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making demands desegregation discussion District educational effects enrollment expect faculty members full professors garbage garbage can model goals Hedmark house meeting ideology illegitimacy implementation important individual interest interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less level of aspiration major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organization organizational choice outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible presidents problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenure theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo values variables Vest-Agder Vestfold Vice-Chancellor vote