 | John W. Yolton - Philosophy - 1977 - 364 pages
...the likeness of something existing without us, than the names that stand for them are the likeness of our ideas, which yet upon hearing they are apt to excite in us. Whatsoever the mind perceives in itself, or is the immediate object of perception, thought, or understanding,... | |
 | Peter Alexander - Science - 1985 - 362 pages
...the likeness of something existing without us, than the Names, that stand for them, are the likeness of our Ideas, which yet upon hearing, they are apt to excite in us. (II.viii.7) Having made the point he now leaves this notion alone while he defines primary and secondary... | |
 | Edward Stillingfleet - Antitrinitarianism - 414 pages
...the Mind no more the likenefs of fonrething exijiingwithout «j, than the Names that ftand for thtm are the likenefs of our Ideas, which yet upon hearing they are apt to excite in us. Now here again our 7Jeas deceive us, in the Way of Certainty. We defire to know fomething of the Nature... | |
 | Michael Ayers - Philosophy - 1999 - 68 pages
...the likeness of something existing without us, than the names, that stand for them, are the likeness of our ideas, which yet upon hearing they are apt to excite in us. 8. Whatsoever the mind perceives in itsetf, or is the immediate object of perception, thought, or understanding,... | |
 | Michael Tye - Psychology - 2000 - 194 pages
...the likeness of something existing without us, than the names that stand for them are the likeness of our ideas, which yet upon hearing they are apt to excite in us. 16 It is hard to reconcile Locke's position here with what he says elsewhere (including the two other... | |
 | Timm Lampert - Art - 2000 - 398 pages
...the likeness of something existing without us, than the names that stand for them are the likeness of our ideas, which yet upon hearing they are apt to excite in us. § 8. Whatsoever the mind perceives in itself, or is the immediate object of perception, thought, or... | |
 | Barry Stroud - Philosophy - 2002 - 258 pages
...the likeness of something existing without us. than the Names, that stand for them, are the likeness of our Ideas, which yet upon hearing, they are apt to excite in us".11 These are all expressions of what is fundamentally the same distinction and the same metaphysical... | |
 | Andrew Bailey - Philosophy - 2002 - 1002 pages
...the likeness of something existing without us, than the names that stand for them are the likeness of our ideas, which yet upon hearing they are apt to excite in us. §8. Whatsoever the mind perceives in itself, or is the immediate object of perception, thought, or... | |
 | Neil Campbell - Philosophy - 2003 - 310 pages
...more the likeness of something existing without us than the names that stand for them are the likeness of our ideas, which yet, upon hearing, they are apt to excite in us," a declaration which paved the way for Berkeley. 5 Les Passions de I'Ame, Art. xxxvi [Passions of the... | |
 | Oliver J. Thatcher - History - 2004 - 466 pages
...the likeness of something existing without us, than the names that stand for them are the likeness of our ideas, which yet upon hearing they are apt to excite in us. 8. Whatsoever the mind perceives in itself, or is the immediate object of perception, thought, or understanding,... | |
| |
... no more the likeness of something existing without us, than the names that stand for them are the likeness of our ideas, which yet upon hearing they are apt to excite in us. 
