|Publication number||US3754601 A|
|Publication date||28 Aug 1973|
|Filing date||26 Jun 1972|
|Priority date||26 Jun 1972|
|Publication number||US 3754601 A, US 3754601A, US-A-3754601, US3754601 A, US3754601A|
|Original Assignee||Linkewich A|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (5), Non-Patent Citations (1), Referenced by (29), Classifications (9)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
lea-4 OR 357549601 SR' Ly 17 f a Aug. 28, 1973 FIRE BOMBING METHOD AND APPARATUS  Inventor: Alexander Llnkewlch, Box 857, Red
Deer, Alberta, Canada  Filed: June 26, 1972  Appl. No.: 266,266
 US. Cl. 169/1 A, 169/2 A, 244/136, 239/171  Int. Cl..... A62c 3/02, A62c 27/30, B05b 17/02  Field 01 Search 169/1 R, 1 A, 2 R, 169/2 A; 244/136; 239/171  References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,220,482 11/1965 Eveleth 169/2 R 3,499,606 3/1970 Smith 239/ 171 X 3,553,128 1/1971 Wilson 169/1 A 3,605,900 9/1971 Livingston et al. 169/1 A 3,698,480 10/1972 Newton 169/1 A OTHER PUBLICATIONS lnteravia, Periodical issue of 1/1968, pp. 50 and 51, Water-Bombing Forest Fires.
Primary Examiner-Robert S. Ward, Jr. Attorney-Ernest Peter Johnson  ABSTRACT A fire bomber is fitted with a large container for storing long-term retardant. A measuring tank is connected between the container and the drop tank of the aircraft; a small measured charge of retardant can thus be intro duced into the drop tank when required. In use, the bomber, almost fully loaded with retardant, is flown to a lake close to a fire to be controlled. A small amount of water is taken on and mixed with the charge of retardant in the drop tank to produce a minimum effective load of retardant slurry. The bomber flies to the fire and drops the slurry thereon. It then returns to the lake to mix a new batch of slurry. This procedure is repeated until the supply of retardant is exhausted. The technique is useful in that its use enables a relatively slow amphibious bomber such as a Canso PBY, to drop as much long-term retardant on a fire as relatively highspeed bombers, such as an A-26 or TBM, operating from an airport.
5 Claims, 4 Drawing Figures Patented Aug. 28, 1973 3 Sheets-Sheet 1 Patented Aug. 28, 1973 3 Sheets-Sheet 2 Patented Aug. 28, 1973 3,754,601
3 Sheets-$heet L6 1 FIRE BOMBING METHOD AND APPARATUS BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to a method for delivering water and retardant to a fire, such as a forest fire. More particularly, it relates to a system for providing loads of retardant slurry on board an aircraft for repeated bombing of a fire. The invention also extends to the novel combination of known parts which provides the means for carrying out the method.
Any fire requires heat, fuel and oxygen in order to maintain itself. It is standard fire-fighting practice to remove one or more of these factors from the fire to extinguish it.
In recent years, aircraft have been used as the delivery means for supplying fire-extinguishing agents, such as water and retardants, to fires in remote areas. These aircraft are commonly termed fire bombers.
When air spotters are used, it is usual to discover a fire within to minutes of the time at which it starts. The fire zone is usually about one-tenth to onefourth acre in size at the time of discovery. It is necessary to contain the fire very quickly; otherwise it will grow too large for continued bombing to be effective. For example, in the dry, wooded areas of California, the fire bombers have about minutes from the time of discovery within which to contain the fire; in the dense forests of Canada, this period is in the order of 120 minutes.
In its crudest form, fire-bombing involves dropping large quantities of water as quickly as possible on the fire. An amphibious aircraft, equipped with drop tanks and a snorkel water-loading device, is flown from an airport to a body of water close to the fire. There it takes on a capacity load of water, usually in the order of 8,000 pounds, and carries it to the fire where it is dropped to remove heat. The aircraft then returns to the lake for another load and repeats this procedure as required. Basic to this approach is the premise that there are usually lakes and rivers which are closer to the forest fire than is theairplanes base.
There are certain shortcomings with the system just described. When dropped from an aircraft, water disperses and forms a fine spray which is easily affected by the convection currents present above a fire. In many instances, .the water never reaches the fire. In addition, water only removes one factor, i.e. heat, from the fire. Enormous quantities of it must be dropped over a very short time span in order to obtain asignificant effect.
The system is improved by mixing short term retardant with the water to be dropped. A short term retardant improves the dropping characteristics of the water and retards its rate of evaporation. The retardant is stored on the aircraft, usually in an amount of about 200 300 pounds, and is mixed with the water being taken aboard to provide a viscous mixture containing about 1 pound of retardant per 100 gallons of water.
In recent years, short term retardants have been largely replaced by long term retardants, such as ammonium sulphate mixed with clay anda sticking agent. The long term retardants are mixed with relatively small amounts of water to form a thick slurry which has good dropping characteristics. When dropped on a fire, the slurry coats the trees to remove fuel, reacts to form ammonia and carbon dioxide gases which dilute the oxygen present, and evaporates slowly to remove heat. This three-pronged attack is much more effective than the previously described systems. The slurry, containing about 1 gallon of liquid retardant concentrate per 4 gallons of water, is prepared at an airport using suitable mixing apparatus. I-Iigh-speed, land-based bombers shuttle between the fire and the airport carrying full capacity loads of slurry on each trip.
The main disadvantage with the long term retardant system is that the aircraft which are used are expensive to purchase and operate.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an object of this invention to provide a method which enables an aircraft to make repeated bombing runs within the critical initial period and drop a large amount (on a cumulative basis) of long term retardant on a fire without returning to the airport after each run.
It is another object to provide a method which can be used by relatively slow, amphibious aircraft, to deliver a large quantity of long term retardant to a fire within the critical initial period.
It is another object to provide modifications to such aircraft to permit their use in the practice of this novel method.
In accordance with the invention, an aircraft, fitted with one or more conventional drop tanks and waterloading means such as a snorkel, is modified by the provision on board of a long term retardant concentrate storage tank, and means for delivering a predetermined charge of concentrate from the storage tank to the drop tank. In operation, the aircraft leaves its base almost fully loaded with concentrate. Enough load carrying capacity is left unused to permit of the taking on board of enough water to form a small but effective drop load of slurry. On flying to a body of water close to the fire, this water is taken on and mixed in the drop tank with a suitable quantity of concentrate. If liquid concentrate is used, the turbulence of the incoming water is sufficient to provide adequate mixing within the drop tank. Now fully loaded, the aircraft flies to the fire and drops the relatively small load of slurry contained in the drop tank. It then returns to the body of water, another charge of concentrate is admitted to the drop tank, water is taken on and mixed with the. concentrate, and the aircraft returns to the fire for a second drop. This procedure is repeateduntil the supply of concentrate is exhausted or the fire is extinguished. The aircraft then returns to base for reloading.
The prior art teaches flying a high-speed aircraft, fully loaded with slurry, to the fire, dropping the entire load, and returning to base for another load so as to repeat the process. In contradistinction, I propose utilizing most of the aircrafts load capacity to carry longterm retardant concentrate to a source of water near the fire. There I mix relatively small quantities of slurry on board the aircraft and then drop the small but effective loads on the fire zone. The mixing and dropping operations are repeated until the supply of concentrate is exhausted. By using this procedure, I find that a slow, amphibious aircraft, such as a Canso PBY can drop sufficient long term retardant slurry within the critical initial period to remain competitive with high-speed, landcarrying capacity of the aircraft; loading water on the aircraft; mixing the water with a charge of retardant concentrate to form a drop load of retardant slurry, said drop load having a weight which is substantially less than the load-carrying capacity of the aircraft; and flying to the fire and dropping the retardant slurry thereon.
Broadly stated, the apparatus in accordance with the invention comprises, in combination: an aircraft, having a load-carrying capacity, equipped with a drop tank and means connected to the drop tank for loading thereinto a pre-determined quantity of water from an exterior source; container means carried by the aircraft, said means being adapted to retain retardant concentrate in an amount such that the weight of the concentrate comprises the major portion of the loadcarrying capacity of the aircraft; and means connecting the container means and drop tank for measuring and delivering a pre-determined quantity of concentrate from the container means to the drop tank when required.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS In the drawing:
FIG. 1 is a schematic, sectional side view of an embodiment of the invention mounted in an aircraft which is fancifully indicated by shadow lines;
FIG. 2 is a front sectional view of the apparatus shown in FIG. 1, taken along section A-A, showing the measuring means and drop doors in shadow lines;
FIG. 3 is a partly broken away side view of another embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 4 is a top view of the invention illustrated in FIG. 3.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT The invention is illustrated in FIG. '1 in conjunction with the conventional dual drop tank 1 of an amphibious aircraft 2 (shown in shadow lines). Each drop tank 1 includes a door In of conventional design for dumping the drop tank contents. A retardant storage tank 3, divided into two compartments 3a by baffle 3b, is mounted over the drop tank 1. A measuring tank 4 is In the position shown, the inlet valve 8 is seated in inlet 5 and outlet valve 9 is unseated; concentrate from the storage tank 3 can thus fill the measuring tank 4. In a second operating position, the flow from the storage tank 3 is closed off by valve 8 seating in inlet 5 while valve 9 is unseated to permit the concentrate charge to drain into a drop tank 1. When the concentrate charge is in place, water is added through the conventional snorkel 10; the float 11 controls the amount of water taken on.
The operation of the invention is now exemplified with reference to a Canso PBY aircraft adapted to carry a load of 8880 pounds and equipped with dual drop and measuring tanks and a storage tank as follows:
TABLE I Capacity Tank Imp. Gallons each drop tank 200 each measuring tank 40 storage tank 360 The aircraft is loaded with 520 gallons (7280 pounds) of long term ammonium sulphate liquid retardant concentrate as follows: 360 gallons in the storage tank; 40 gallons in each measuring tank and each drop tank. The aircraft is flown to a body of water close to the fire and 160 gallons of water are picked up and mixed with the concentrate in one drop tank to provide 200 gallons of slurry. The total load is now 8880 pounds, which is the full capacity of the aircraft. The aircraft is then flown to the fire and the slurry is dropped. This procedure is repeated for a total of five drops, at which time sufficient weight has been disposed of to begin loading each of the two drop tanks with 40 gallons of concentrate and 160 gallons of water.'This loading is repeated for four drops, at which time the concentrate supply has been depleted.
A Canso PBY aircraft equipped in this manner carrying fuel sufficient to last 3 hours and 30 minutes can deliver about 29,120 pounds of slurry within a mile radius of its base in approximately 2 1% hours.
In Table II hereinbelow, the theoretical long term retardant delivery performance of the Canso PBY aircraft is compared with that of two high-speed aircraft commonly usedfor fire-bombing; 1
TABLE II.-CO.\IIARISON OF AIR TANKER DELIVERY CAILABILITIESI Number of Numberof Total Total min. pm 1,000 Tim" Air- Returns to lbs. time, lbs. of lrolpped advantaw- Aircraft speed airport dropped min. 5 urry pert-em 50 Mile Radius Canso 130 1 29,120 156 5. 36 26 250 3 26, 880 I72 6. 4f) l TBM I 5 '28, 000 180 10.00 :7
Mile Radius Canso 1 6.800 m0 7.0.- 350 3 26,880 344 05 'IBM. 5 28, 000 450 16. 07 1'27 1 Based on a situation where a body olwatcris uvailahlv to l he Canso 1') miles from th tin.
While the invention has been described with refer ence to a measuring tank system whose capacity is fixed, other equivalent means could be used to feed batches of concentrate to the drop tank in fixed or ever 5 increasing amounts as the weight of the concentrate on board is lightened by dropping. For example, such an alternative System is shown in FIGS. 3 and 4.
The system comprises of two 400 gallon water drop tanks 100,101. The drop tanks are mounted side by side in the hull 102 at the centre of gravity. An overflow line 103 connects the drop tanks with the outside for dumping any overflow. This line 103 can also be used for loading water during land-based operations. A snorkel 104 is provided in conventional manner for loading the drop tanks through line 105. Two 260 gallon retardant tanks 106, 107 are located fore and aft of the drop tanks. A port 108 connects the front retardant tank with the outside for filling. To eliminate unbalance during pumping or loading of the retardant, a pipe 109 interconnects the retardant tanks. While not shown, each of the drop and retardant tanks will normally be equipped with liquid level indicating probes adapted to provide a reading within the cockpit. Each retardant tank is connected with one of the drop tanks by a line 110 and positive displacement-type pump 111. The pump functions to transfer retardant into the drop tank and is normally equipped with a volume meter (not shown) adapted to provide a reading in the cockpit. The pump will usually be operable from the cockpit via an electric or hydraulic circuit (not shown). Each retardant tank is also connected with a drop tank by a dump line 112 controlled by a normally closed valve 113. In the event that the load is to be jettisoned, the retardant and water can be dumped through the dump doors 114.
The main advantage of this alternative system is that the pilot can control the volume of retardant which is admitted to the drop tank by means of the displacement pump.
What is claimed is: 1. In combination: an aircraft, having a load-carrying capacity and equipped with a drop tank, and means connected to the drop tank for loading thereinto a predetermined quantity of water from an exterior source;
container means carried by the aircraft, said means being adapted to retain retardant concentrate in an amount such that the weight of the concentrate comprises the major portion of the load carrying capacity of the aircraft; and' means connecting the container means and drop tank for delivering a pre-determined quantity of concentrate from the container means to the drop tank when required.
2. In combination:
an aircraft equipped with a drop tank and means connected to the drop tank for loading thereinto a predetermined quantity of water from an exterior source; 1
l a retardant concentrate storage tank carried within the aircraft above the drop tank;
a measuring tank having inlet means connecting it with the storage tank and outlet means connecting it with the drop tank; and
valve means, associated with the measuring tank,
adapted to control the batch flow of retardant concentrate into and out of the said tank from the storage tank to the drop tank.
3. In combination:
an aircraft equipped with drop tank means and means connected to the drop tank means for loading thereinto a pre-determined quantity of water from an exterior source;
second tank means, for holding a supply of retardant concentrate, mounted within the aircraft;
pump and line means connecting the retardant and drop tank means for transferring retardant concentrate therebetween;
the liquid-carrying capacity of the second tank means being substantially greater than that of the drop tank means.
4. A method for delivering water and retardant to a fire which comprises:
flying an aircraft to a body of water which is relatively close to the fire, said aircraft carrying a supply of long term retardant concentrate aboard, said retardant concentrate having a total weight which makes up the major portion of the load capacity of the aircraft; 1
loading water on the aircraft;
mixing the water with a charge of retardant concentrate to form a'drop load of slurry, said drop load having a weight which is substantially less than the load capacity of the aircraft; and
flying to the fire and dropping the retardant slurry thereon.
5. The method as set forth in claim.4 including the additional steps comprising:
flying the aircraft back to the body of water after the first drop; I loading water on the aircraft;
mixing the water with a charge of retardant concentrate to form a drop load of slurry, said drop load having a weight which is substantially less than the load capacity of the aircraft;
flying to the fire and dropping the retardant slurry thereon; and
repeating this procedure until at least a substantial proportion of the retardant supply has been dropped.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3220482 *||6 Jan 1965||30 Nov 1965||Kempton A Eveleth||Fire fighting apparatus and method|
|US3499606 *||20 Jun 1967||10 Mar 1970||Hercules Inc||Invert emulsion spray apparatus and method|
|US3553128 *||20 Dec 1967||5 Jan 1971||Stull Chemical Co||Fire fighting method and compositions|
|US3605900 *||10 Oct 1968||20 Sep 1971||Factory Mutual Res Corp||Method of controlling fire|
|US3698480 *||12 Jul 1971||17 Oct 1972||Aero Union Corp||Dual tank air borne fire retardant dispensing system|
|1||*||Interavia, Periodical issue of 1/1968, pp. 50 and 51, Water Bombing Forest Fires.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4172499 *||5 Dec 1977||30 Oct 1979||Canadair Limited||Powder and water mixing and dropping system onboard an aircraft|
|US4441673 *||19 Aug 1981||10 Apr 1984||Muscatell Ralph P||Airfoil fuel ejection device|
|US4601345 *||10 Jun 1985||22 Jul 1986||Mahrt David M||Mixing and drop system for fire retardants|
|US4936389 *||18 Jul 1988||26 Jun 1990||Aero Union Corporation||Fluid dispenser for an aircraft|
|US4979571 *||12 Dec 1988||25 Dec 1990||Macdonald Alan B||Foam producing apparatus and method for emergency foam delivery systems|
|US5279481 *||25 Aug 1992||18 Jan 1994||Air Tractor Inc.||Airborne liquid-spreading system|
|US5320185 *||15 Jun 1992||14 Jun 1994||Erickson Air-Crane Co.||Aircraft fluid drop system|
|US5326053 *||30 Mar 1993||5 Jul 1994||Pahl Larry T||Controlled flow aerial delivery system|
|US5451016 *||6 Oct 1993||19 Sep 1995||Erickson Air-Crane Co.||Aircraft fluid drop system|
|US5829809 *||27 May 1997||3 Nov 1998||Donald Brian Arney||Multi-dump fire fighting bucket|
|US5967462 *||9 Oct 1997||19 Oct 1999||Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada, As Represented By The Minister Of Natural Resources||Water bomber float plane and method of water bombing|
|US6024295 *||26 Mar 1998||15 Feb 2000||Sanchez; John P.||Fire retardant|
|US6125942 *||11 Mar 1999||3 Oct 2000||Continuum Dynamics, Inc.||Aircraft-based fire-fighting bucket|
|US7040579||24 Jan 2005||9 May 2006||The Boeing Company||Auxiliary fuel tank systems for aircraft and methods for their manufacture and use|
|US7051979 *||29 Jan 2004||30 May 2006||The Boeing Company||Auxiliary fuel tank systems for aircraft and methods for their manufacture and use|
|US7357149||29 Jan 2004||15 Apr 2008||The Boeing Company||Auxiliary fuel tank systems for aircraft and methods for their manufacture and use|
|US7357355||8 May 2006||15 Apr 2008||The Boeing Company||Auxiliary fuel tank systems for aircraft and methods for their manufacture and use|
|US7568660||26 May 2006||4 Aug 2009||The Boeing Company||Auxiliary fuel tank systems for aircraft and methods for their manufacture and use|
|US8096323||12 Aug 2005||17 Jan 2012||Zoltan Von Mohos||Device for receiving liquids in aircraft and/or releasing liquids therefrom|
|US8165731 *||12 Sep 2008||24 Apr 2012||Lonestar Inventions, L.P.||System for aerial delivery of fire retardant|
|US9022133 *||8 Nov 2011||5 May 2015||Leonard E. Doten||Polymer mixer powered by hydrodynamic forces|
|US9038961 *||9 Dec 2010||26 May 2015||Eads Deutschland Gmbh||Method for simulating the movement behaviour of a fluid in a closed, moving container|
|US20050178880 *||29 Jan 2004||18 Aug 2005||Howe Mark E.||Auxiliary fuel tank systems for aircraft and methods for their manufacture and use|
|US20050178916 *||24 Jan 2005||18 Aug 2005||Howe Mark E.||Auxiliary fuel tank systems for aircraft and methods for their manufacture and use|
|US20100070111 *||12 Sep 2008||18 Mar 2010||Lonestar Inventions. L.P.||System for aerial delivery of fire retardant|
|US20100178176 *||8 Jan 2010||15 Jul 2010||Jeremy Kenyon||Retractable Pump System|
|US20130112907 *||9 May 2013||Leonard E. Doten||Polymer mixer powered by hydrodynamic forces|
|US20140107859 *||9 Dec 2010||17 Apr 2014||Eads Deutschland Gmbh||Method for Simulating the Movement Behaviour of a Fluid in a Closed, Moving Container|
|WO2006024383A1 *||12 Aug 2005||9 Mar 2006||Mohos Zoltan Von||Device for receiving liquids in an aircraft and/or releasing liquids therefrom|
|U.S. Classification||169/44, 169/53, 239/171, 169/47, 244/136|
|International Classification||B64D1/16, B64D1/00|